A Swift Alternative: The Pros and Cons of Expedited Arbitration

A Swift Alternative: The Pros and Cons of Expedited Arbitration


In today’s legal landscape, time is of the essence. Parties involved in disputes seek efficient and cost-effective methods of resolving their conflicts. One alternative gaining popularity is expedited arbitration. In this article, we will explore the pros and cons of this swift alternative to traditional arbitration.

What is Expedited Arbitration?

Expedited arbitration is a streamlined process designed to resolve disputes more quickly than traditional arbitration. It involves a shortened timeline, limited discovery, and an expedited hearing. This alternative method aims to save time and costs for the parties involved.

The Pros of Expedited Arbitration

1. Efficiency: Expedited arbitration offers a faster resolution compared to traditional arbitration, which can often take months or even years. The shortened timeline allows parties to swiftly resolve their disputes and move forward.

2. Cost Savings: By reducing the duration of the arbitration process, parties can save on legal fees and related expenses. This is particularly beneficial for individuals and small businesses with limited resources.

3. Flexibility: Expedited arbitration allows parties to customize the process to suit their specific needs. They have more control over the selection of arbitrators, hearing dates, and the scope of discovery, providing a more tailored approach to dispute resolution.

The Cons of Expedited Arbitration

1. Reduced Discovery: Expedited arbitration often limits the amount of discovery available to the parties involved. This can hinder their ability to gather crucial evidence and potentially impact the outcome of the arbitration.

2. Less Extensive Hearing: Due to the expedited nature of the process, parties may have limited time to present their case during the hearing. This can be challenging for complex disputes that require detailed arguments and evidence.

3. Limited Appellate Rights: In expedited arbitration, the right to appeal the decision is typically restricted. This can be a disadvantage for parties who believe that the arbitrator made an error in interpreting the law or facts of the case.


1. Is expedited arbitration suitable for all types of disputes?

Expedited arbitration is generally suitable for disputes with a lower monetary value or those that require a prompt resolution. However, complex and high-stakes cases may benefit from a more comprehensive arbitration process.

2. Can parties choose their arbitrators in expedited arbitration?

Yes, parties have the ability to select their arbitrators in expedited arbitration. This allows them to choose individuals with relevant expertise and experience in their specific industry or legal area.

3. What happens if one party fails to comply with the expedited arbitration process?

If a party fails to comply with the expedited arbitration process, the arbitrator may impose sanctions or other measures to ensure the efficiency and fairness of the proceedings.


Expedited arbitration offers a swift alternative for resolving disputes, providing efficiency and cost savings. However, it also comes with certain limitations, such as reduced discovery and limited appellate rights. Understanding the pros and cons of expedited arbitration is crucial for parties seeking a timely resolution. Consider the specific circumstances of your dispute before opting for this alternative method.

For more information on expedited arbitration, you may refer to the following resources:

About Lucas Mitchell

Check Also

Why Expedited Arbitration is Gaining Popularity in Legal Circles

Why Expedited Arbitration is Gaining Popularity in Legal Circles Expedited arbitration has been on the …